Which methodology focuses on simulating attacks for threat analysis?

The methodology that focuses on simulating attacks for threat analysis is PASTA, which stands for Process for Attack Simulation and Threat Analysis. This approach is structured to provide a thorough examination of potential threats by simulating real-world attack scenarios. PASTA emphasizes understanding the motivations of potential attackers, their methods, and the vulnerabilities of the system in question. It aids organizations in prioritizing risks by illustrating how an attack could unfold, thereby allowing them to allocate resources more effectively to mitigate those risks.

This method is particularly valuable because it involves a comprehensive risk management process, including defining security requirements, identifying and assessing assets and threats, and conducting simulations to uncover vulnerabilities. It helps organizations to proactively strengthen their defenses by understanding how attackers think and operate.

In contrast, other methodologies like STRIDE focus on identifying threats based on certain characteristics rather than simulating attacks, VAST is more concerned with integrating security considerations into the development process, and SARADA emphasizes risk assessment without specific focus on attack simulation. Consequently, PASTA stands out for its strong emphasis on attack simulation in the context of threat analysis.